Advantages of Coulter Principle counters over image-based systems

Whether you are in the medical research field, pharmaceutical industry, or bioprocessing industry, you are most likely to be analyzing tons of cells every day. Coulter Principle-based counters and imaging systems are the most commonly used methods to quantify cell populations. You may come across these terms almost every day, but here is a look at what they are and how they work.

Coulter Principle

The Coulter Principle was developed in the 1950s to overcome the challenge of counting cells with speed and is named after its inventor, Wallace H. Coulter. It is the gold standard for cell counting and sizing. It relies on the measurement of electrical impedance to determine the size and count of particles in a sample. As the cells in the sample pass through a small aperture, they disrupt an electric current, leading to changes in impedance. By measuring these changes, the size and count of the particles can be determined accurately.

Imaging Systems

Imaging systems provide a visual approach to cell analysis. They use light-based techniques such as light blocking or light scattering. They capture high-resolution images of the particles, allowing detailed morphological analysis and characterization. These images are analyzed by sophisticated software to determine the size, shape, and count of the particles.

While each method comes with its own set of benefits, the choice lies in the specific requirements of the analysis.

Advantages of Coulter Principle cell counting over image-based counting

Here, we have listed the areas where the Coulter Principle outshines image-based counting.

image1

Speed

With the Coulter Principle comes speed. Coulter Principle-based cell counters are generally faster than image-based systems, as thousands of cells can be analyzed in seconds. Cells passing through an aperture cause a change in the electrical impedance, which is used to determine cell count and size. This allows for rapid, continuous counting of cells without the need for manual focusing or image acquisition, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.

Simplicity

Counters based on the Coulter Principle are relatively simple to use, requiring minimal operator intervention once the instrument is set up. This simplicity makes them well-suited for routine cell counting in clinical laboratories where consistent and efficient results are essential. Imaging systems, on the other hand, require computational algorithms for analyzing the images. The choice of imaging technique and sample preparation method also impacts data interpretation.

Accuracy and Precision

Coulter Principle-based cell counting can provide accurate, precise, and repeatable cell counts, particularly for samples with high cell densities or those containing a mixture of cell types. Image-based methods may struggle with dense samples or require additional processing steps to ensure accurate counts. Certain particles may not even get detected.

Robustness

Coulter Principle cell counters can handle a wide range of cell sizes and types without the need for specialized stains or reagents. Image-based methods may require specific staining protocols for certain cell types, making them more sensitive to variations in staining quality.

Minimal Sample Preparation

Cell counters based on the Coulter Principle typically require minimal sample preparation, often just a dilution of the cell sample in an appropriate buffer. Whereas in image-based methods, samples may be required to be evenly spread out on a glass slide, and may require additional steps such as fixing, and staining, which can be time-consuming and introduce potential sources of error.

Consistency

One of the attractive features of the Coulter Principle is its reproducibility. It provides consistent and standardized results across different operators and instruments, as it relies on a well-defined physical principle. Image-based methods can be influenced by variations in imaging settings and image analysis algorithms, user interpretation and biases, and other factors.

Imaging systems also come with advantages such as the ability to provide detailed morphological information, such as cell shape, size distribution, and even subcellular features. However, advancements in Coulter Principle-based counters enable them to perform additional analyses.

Advanced Coulter Principle cell analyzers

Unlike other cell counters that use the Coulter Principle, ORFLO’s Moxi GO II and Moxi V enable cell analysis beyond counts, in an affordable way. They provide viability assessments and identify specific cell populations through simultaneous fluorescence detection. These cell analyzers combine the Coulter Principle to precisely measure the volumetric particle size of each particle with fluorescence for cell viability analysis. With Moxi V, get true cell viability counts 50-100x times more sensitive than vision counters. Moxi GO II goes a step beyond to provide you with cell health assays, robust CAR-T monitoring, cellular response profiling, and immunoprofiling.

Both the Coulter Principle and imaging systems were developed to meet the growing demands for cell analysis in the field of cell biology and clinical research. While the Coulter Principle is the gold standard for counting cells, imaging systems offer additional details on cell morphology. The best way to choose is to consider the specific requirements of the experiment, the types of cells being counted, and the level of detail required.

See why researchers use the Moxi cell analyzers for counting cells with precision every day. Here's a free infographic for you.

To talk to our experts, contact us.